Results
Run it in your browser — every command on this page, in a live notebook at the bottom. No install.
Seal inputs, record outputs, and bind a paper’s claims to the runs behind them.
Part of reproducible-science alongside repro, citations and prereg — see the documentation.
Install
Section titled “Install”pip install results-cliQuick start
Section titled “Quick start”results initresults seal prereg.md analysis.py data.csv --role inputresults access "read zenodo metadata" --level "metadata only"
# run the computation, then record its outputsresults run output.json --run-id exp_001 --note "ICC analysis"results claim "ICC = 0.42" --run-id exp_001 --confirmatory --location "Table 2"results verify --fileschain intact: 5 events
access 1 claim 1 init 1 run 1 seal 1
file hashes: ok prereg.md ok analysis.py ok data.csv ok output.json
all checks passed.Commands
Section titled “Commands”| Command | What it does |
|---|---|
results init |
Start tracking results here |
results seal <file>... |
Hash inputs before a run |
results access <note> |
Record a data-access event |
results run <file>... |
Record outputs after a run |
results claim <text> |
Bind a manuscript claim to a run |
results verify |
Check the ledger chain and every hash it names |
The chain
Section titled “The chain”A number in a manuscript names a claim. The claim names a run. The run names its outputs. The outputs were hashed when they were recorded. The inputs were hashed before the run started.
manuscript → claim → run → output file → sha256 input files → sha256results verify --files walks the whole thing and tells you what moved.
Data-access levels
Section titled “Data-access levels”The access timeline is what makes the confirmatory/exploratory distinction verifiable.
| Level | Meaning |
|---|---|
nothing seen |
No target data touched |
metadata only |
Structure, region names, sample sizes — not outcomes |
structure seen |
Data shape and distributions, not the target variable |
outcomes seen |
The dependent variable was observed |
An analysis registered after outcomes seen is retrospective.
Verify output
Section titled “Verify output”| Result | Meaning |
|---|---|
chain intact |
Every event’s prev_hash matches the line before it |
CHAIN BROKEN |
The ledger was edited after it was written |
ok |
File matches its recorded hash |
CHANGED |
File was modified since it was recorded |
MISSING |
File no longer exists |
The ledger
Section titled “The ledger”Append-only JSONL in .results/ledger.jsonl. Each line is hash-chained to the previous — editing
or inserting a line breaks the chain. git diff shows what changed; results verify checks
whether it should have.
Claude Code
Section titled “Claude Code”plugin/ is a Claude Code plugin. Three surfaces, because each catches a different failure:
the hook catches what the model does not think to do, the skill catches what you did not know
to ask for, and the command is there for when you want the answer now.
| surface | fires |
|---|---|
| hook | when a number enters a manuscript that no recorded claim names |
| skill | when Claude judges the situation calls for sealing inputs, recording outputs, binding a paper’s claims to runs |
| command | when you type /results-check |
Why the hook. The address is on screen while the sentence is being written and gone immediately afterward. A number recovered later has to be matched by its digits, and a value reported to two or three significant figures matches something in an artifact of any size.
It reports and never blocks, and stays silent in a project with no .results/ ledger.
/plugin marketplace add elliottower/reproducible-science/plugin install results@reproducible-scienceThe plugin ships instructions and hooks, not binaries, so install the tool as well:
uv tool install results-cli # or: pip install results-cliAll four tools in one plugin, with every hook, skill and command:
/plugin install reproducible-science@reproducible-scienceMIT licensed.
This tool and repro
Section titled “This tool and repro”results installs and runs on its own, is not deprecated, and is not going to be.
reproducible-science depends on it, so repro results ... runs this same command with the
same arguments and the same exit code. That is a spelling, not a feature.
What only exists in the umbrella is repro check, which runs every tool a project uses in one
pass, with one report and one exit code, and names the tools the project does not use rather
than counting them as passing. If a project only records runs, use this command directly.